> On Aug 24, 2023, at 9:29 PM, Sellam Abraham via cctalk > <cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > ... > It's obvious that the Apple 1 has the value it does not so much for its > technology but for what it represents, and that's all that matters. This reminds me of the observation that economics is a branch of psychology: the value of stuff is subjective and personal. (It has to be, because in a trade each person exchanges an item for a different item valued more highly *by that person*.) So arguing about it doesn't get you very far. paul
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Peter Corlett via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Bill Degnan via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Michael Thompson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Gordon Henderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Bill Degnan via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Eric Smith via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Bill Degnan via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Eric Smith via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Sellam Abraham via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Bill Degnan via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Bill Degnan via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Gavin Scott via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 js--- via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Joshua Rice via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Apple 1 Bill Degnan via cctalk