The Intlec 4 was no more or less a computer than the Altiar or IMSAI was. It didn't typically have as much RAM but one could write and run code on it. As for the F14 processor. For the purpose used, it was likely a DSP. More intended to do matrix multiplication using adds and shifts. This would be similar to Intel's early try at a DSP. The F14 processor was said to control the flight surfaces. Like the Intel 2920 ( not to be confused with the AMD bit slice part) it likely ran tight loops of signal processing operations using tables of lookup coefficients. Dwight
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004 Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) ED SHARPE via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) ED SHARPE via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Steve Lewis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) dwight via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) ED SHARPE via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) dwight via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) ED SHARPE via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Christian Corti via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Steve Lewis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Christian Corti via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Steve Lewis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel 4004(sp?) Bill Degnan via cctalk