Typically the OS was not stored on punchcards.
b

On Sun, Mar 1, 2026 at 11:51 AM bluewater emailtoilet.com via cctalk
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Punchcards? You want punchcards? I got punchcards. Not exactly what I think 
> you are looking for but a large sample. Please check out 
> www.punchcardarchive.com
>
> Check the Stats page for a quick summary.  Beware the Album page. It takes a 
> while to load. After all, it has to display 25532 cards.
>
> Not a full program but doing a search on CCROS in the Title field will show a 
> few cards that represent a few bits of a read only S/360 program.
>
> Donald
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lewis via cctalk <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2026 11:34 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <[email protected]>
> Cc: Steve Lewis <[email protected]>
> Subject: [cctalk] Operating system, on punch cards?
>
> So studying about 1960s operating systems recently, it occurred to me that
> the ASR-33 wasn't really "a thing" until the late 1960s.   Yes, they
> technically existed since 1963, but even going through 1960s Datamation 
> issues - you don't see a lot of ads or mention of ASR-33 until 1965.
>
> The IBM 1050 maybe existed in 1961 for the IBM 709, but even so - general 
> thought is that CTSS (operating system) was largely initially developed using 
> punch cards.
>
> So - are there any archives or collections of these original punch cards?
> Or are they essentially all gone/destroyed, since in general after some code 
> was "perfected" it was likely then archived to tape?
>
> Anyway, apologies - it was just something that only recently occurred to me, 
> that basically all of the original operating systems originated on punch 
> cards: CTSS, Supervisor, AOSP, SCOPE, even MULTICs.  So - do any of
> those decks of cards still exist in archive?   Would be neat to see a photo
> of those - except it would be a shoebox of punch cards like any other, I 
> suppose.
>
> Or is this wrong, and the top tier teams making these OS's, probably had 
> teletypes and all the magnetic tape they wanted?
>
> -Steve

Reply via email to