> On Jun 20, 2021, at 1:19 PM, Norman Jaffe via cctech <cctech@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > Basically, pre-1960, there couldn't be a 'general book on programming', since > every system was a unique environment - the only languages that could even be > remotely considered to be common were ALGOL 60 and FORTRAN II... and they > were 'extended' by every manufacturer to provide, at least, some form of I/O > beyond line printers and punch card readers / punches or to support different > character sets. True, unless you were to set out to write a general course on programming that doesn't dig down to the level of any particular assembly language or machine architecture. From a quick look, I think the 1957 course by Dekker, Dijkstra, and van Wijngaarden I mentioned in my previous note does just that. And that explains the title, "Programming automatic calculating machines" (as opposed to the more common "Programming the xyzzy-42 machine"). paul
- RE: Early Programming Books Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books ben via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books Toby Thain via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Bo... ben via cctech
- Re: Early Programmin... Brent Hilpert via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books David Wade via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books Chuck Guzis via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Bo... Norman Jaffe via cctech
- Re: Early Programmin... Cory Heisterkamp via cctech
- Re: Early Programmin... Paul Koning via cctech
- RE: Early Programmin... Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Bo... Chuck Guzis via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Bo... Paul Birkel via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books David Wade via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books Bill Degnan via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books Bill Degnan via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books Fred Cisin via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books Michael Mulhern via cctech