Hi Angel,

2009/5/21 Angel Herráez <[email protected]>:
> I guess this is trivial for you, but just in case it is contributing
> to your problem I will say it:
>
> JChemPaint 2.4 is JCP2, while JChemPaint 2.5 is really JCP3beta. The
> code is totally rewritten for JCP3.

Yes, thanx for pointing this out... I guess this is indeed not clear
to the outside...

JChemPaint-NG is really maturing now, and one big important
refactoring was that it is now widget set indepdendent, and has SWT
and Swing support. This was not easy but the involved programmers
(Niels, Arvid, Gilleain and Stefan) have been working really hard on
it working out the design started 2 years ago. The upside of this is,
is that the current new JChemPaint can be used as applet, as Java
Swing application *and* as SWT Widget/Editor in Eclipse-RCP
applications, like Bioclipse (which just released a final beta, where
you can try the new JChemPaint-SWT in action).

The new design has *many* advantages, not all shown to full power yet,
but is more flexible, and you can expect much better customization,
etc. Effectively, this will likely enable us to make a small (<50kB)
JChemPaint applet, of course with limited functionality compared to
the full-blown CDK-enriched one, but should be a fully functional
molecule editor.

More on that soon, I hope, and if interested, please check the
cdk-jchempaint mailing list archives.

Egon

-- 
Post-doc @ Uppsala University
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user

Reply via email to