Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have been reading the dvd+rw-tools FAQ and I have found this in > >> there: > >> > >>=== > >>Version 5.6 adds support for Solaris 2.x [commercial licensing terms > >>for distribution on Solaris are to be settled with Inserve > >>Technology]. > >>=== > >> > >> > > > >As the program claims to use the GPL, such note would not be legal > >and commercial use cannot be limited to a single company. > > > > You may be right in Europe, in the USA if I hold the copyright I may > grant several non-exclusive licenses under different terms. It's not > even unusual. With commercial software I may sell a right to use > quantity one to an end user, a site or company license to a large > organization, and a right to duplicate and resell to another (if I trust > them to pay royalties). And I might grant a free right to use to a > charity if I was a nice person.
Looks like you did not get my point: why should there be a need to use a non GPL variant? Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]