Danny Backx wrote: > I don't have the DLL mentioned on that MSDN page on my PDA. (That makes > sense, the page says it only applies to Windows Embedded CE which I > don't think I have.) > > The functions are all in our coredll.def, but without the ordinal. Would > that be the problem ?
No, as that only affects the load time. Missing/extra dllimport in some header? http://blogs.msdn.com/russellk/default.aspx But that is such a long shot, really. Instead of doing guess work, someone should profile it, and compare the generated code of both compilers. Nobody said it yet in this thread, as it is somewhat obvious, but make sure you aren't forgetting to turn on the optimizers in gcc (-Ox). The difference will probably be in some loop code. Cheers, Pedro Alves ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
