On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 00:14 +0200, Jacek M. Holeczek wrote: > > FYI : I've committed based mostly on Jacek's input. > > Sorry guys, I was away for a week or so. I had no way to check your > patches (Danny's and Pedro's). I've looked at them now. They both seem to > be looking fine (I have no possibility to test them in a compiled code). > Let me, however, say one thing. With your patches, the structure becomes > really awful.
My feeling about my own patch is exactly the same. That, and Pedro's
comment made me commit your patch instead of the ones I put on E-mail.
One of the other patches is "based on" your submission because we
already had part of the changes you proposed in SVN.
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
