On 2012/05/06 05:49, Pavel Pavlov <pa...@summit-tech.ca> wrote: > Hello all, it seems that cegcc is quite dead, or people who use it > are happy with it (just like me).
Did you know that I published cegcc with gcc 4.6.3 and other updates? I started the 4.7 update, but ran into so many merge conflicts that I postponed it. > Now, with WinPhone8 it rejects the libs as invalid. Upcoming > VisualStudio and Windows 8 have ARM support out of the box. armasm > (which looks too similar to armasm that comes with arm's dev tools) > lists three types of machine targets: arm, thumb, armce. Any idea > what's different? Do they use different object format (quite > unlikely), or they simply added different CPU id for otherwise > identical objects? Reportedly, WinPhone8 is based on the Windows 8 (desktop) kernel, not on the WinCE kernel. That may make a difference, even if only for the OS declaration. Try objdump on WinPhone7 and 8 (native) binaries and look for differences. Since there is only official support for CIL code on WinPhone, there was no need for native code compatibility. Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
