Hi, > Note: contact is a group of one or more buddies. Cim5 hides > buddies by default, you can use the plus key (`+') to display > buddies associated with a contact.
I don't think it is necessary to have different color scheme settings for buddylistcontact and buddylistbuddy. I mean, how many people does even change these settings? Anyway, because buddylistcontact atd buddylistbuddy have seperate color schemes this ends up in a mess I think. Not that clean to define buddylistcontact_online buddylistcontact_offline buddylistcontact_away buddylistcontact_na and the same for buddylistbuddy. If finer granularity (extended away etc) is desired it means even more color scheme settings. What about sharing color scheme settings for both buddylistcontact and buddylistbuddy? Oh, another reason this ends up in a mess is that color schemes are defined as strings. buddy and contact therefore either requires seperate functions for updating color scheme or an update function that works with strings. Suggestions? If not, I will just email a patch. How are patches handled, emailed to list or pushed into some repo? /PH -- Per-Henrik Lundblom epost: p...@whatever.nu telefon: 0733-20 71 26 hemsida: www.whatever.nu -- _______________________________________________ Centerim-devel mailing list Centerim-devel@centerim.org http://centerim.org/mailman/listinfo/centerim-devel http://www.centerim.org/
