On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Good Evening (Dag and Karan),
I have noticed the slight changes on the Download Page which is now
linking to the RHEL Betas and want to take the discussion to the ML
instead of the Wiki.
I would personally prefer to link to the RHEL Betas from a (not yet
created) Test-driving RHEL SIG page instead of the CentOS download
page. This should be meant to promote project related downloads
(resources provided by CentOS) only.
I dont understand the fascination with the RHEL beta's at all. They clearly
dont want it in the open space, so why are we pushing for that ?
Has anyone spoken to the people at Redhat ? What have they said ? When are we
going to see the public images ? Rather than going ahead and placing stuff
like that on the website, there should at the very least be a discussion
about this. Ironic that Dag would comment on this issue asking for a
discussion when he asked the question earlier and never bothered replying to
comments that people made to his question.
I can see that Dag has reinstated the portion that I removed earlier today.
Dag perhaps you missed my comment to your question ? or you rather wish to
ignore it at the time w.r.t what we could / should do with the RHEL betas ?
I did no have anything to add. I do understand your point and I agree with
it partly. I normally do not ack on every email that I agree with.
We are not pushing the RHEL Betas by mentioning it on the wiki, are we ?
You did not say we should not mention it. Other people replied favorably.
I indicated on the wiki that you needed a RHN entitlement to be able to
download it (which is what I think Tim wanted) so how is that pushing ?
And yes I contacted Red Hat via 3 different people and I am awaiting
feedback. One person pushed it internally within Red Hat.
The problem here is that you are strongly against it while at least 2
people were favorable. And that you removed my changes with a question
through the wiki comments that I could have answered by email.
I have no problem to discuss it, or change it, or move it to another part,
or even remove if completely. But I do object to the communication-by-wiki
style. And I do object to the fact that if you disagree with something it
seems to be the law.
That is why I put it back and answered your question where it was asked,
through the wiki comments.
--
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
