On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Johnny Hughes <joh...@centos.org> wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote: > > On 11/07/2014 01:20 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes <joh...@centos.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian <rob...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster < > >>> leonfaus...@googlemail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> BTW: > >>>>>> > >>> > http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/ > >>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the > >>> official > >>>>> "supplementary" ones from RH? > >>>>> > >>>>> In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, > >>> environment, > >>>>> etc... ? > >>> Yes, those use the Developer Tool Set .. the ones from Red Hat do not. > >>> > >>> I can not get the Sources for the Red Hat supplemental channel because > >>> they do distribute the pepperflash component. > >>> > >>> I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS. > >>> > >>> > >> Am I correct in interpreting, that even if RH wanted to release the > >> supplemental package for Chromium to CentOS they would not be able to > >> because it contains the pepperflash component. > >> > > > > The "chromium-browser" RPM from the supplemental channel doesn't appear > > to have pepperflash included in it: > > > > $ rpm -qilv chromium-browser|grep -i flash > > > > As opposed to "google-chrome-stable": > > > > $ rpm -qilv google-chrome-stable | grep -i flash > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Oct 21 18:53 > > /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17350240 Oct 21 18:53 > > /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2045 Oct 21 18:53 > > /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/manifest.json > > > > The .spec file for chromium-browser does have conditionals in it, such > as: > > > > %define flash 0 > > > > Looks like pepperflash is added from google-chrome-stable if flash is > > defined... > > OK new version posted. > > This uses the centos-6 testing key and is available here: > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/ > > The repo file is here: > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/chromium-el6.repo > > This version is now called chromium-browser and not chromium, so if you > have the older version, you will need to: > > yum remove chromium > > then > > yum install chromium-browser > > Later updates should happen with yum update and the name chromium-browser > > Thank you so much Johnny. You're the man! My students and I really appreciate your work. cheers _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos