I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number keys.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Cian Mc Govern <c...@cianmcgovern.com> wrote: > On 8 November 2014 13:52, Johnny Hughes <joh...@centos.org> wrote: > > > On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote: > > > On 11/07/2014 01:20 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes <joh...@centos.org> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > >>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian <rob...@gmail.com > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster < > > >>> leonfaus...@googlemail.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> BTW: > > >>>>>> > > >>> > > > http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/ > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the > > >>> official > > >>>>> "supplementary" ones from RH? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, > > >>> environment, > > >>>>> etc... ? > > >>> Yes, those use the Developer Tool Set .. the ones from Red Hat do > not. > > >>> > > >>> I can not get the Sources for the Red Hat supplemental channel > because > > >>> they do distribute the pepperflash component. > > >>> > > >>> I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Am I correct in interpreting, that even if RH wanted to release the > > >> supplemental package for Chromium to CentOS they would not be able to > > >> because it contains the pepperflash component. > > >> > > > > > > The "chromium-browser" RPM from the supplemental channel doesn't appear > > > to have pepperflash included in it: > > > > > > $ rpm -qilv chromium-browser|grep -i flash > > > > > > As opposed to "google-chrome-stable": > > > > > > $ rpm -qilv google-chrome-stable | grep -i flash > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Oct 21 18:53 > > > /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17350240 Oct 21 18:53 > > > /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2045 Oct 21 18:53 > > > /opt/google/chrome/PepperFlash/manifest.json > > > > > > The .spec file for chromium-browser does have conditionals in it, such > > as: > > > > > > %define flash 0 > > > > > > Looks like pepperflash is added from google-chrome-stable if flash is > > > defined... > > > > OK new version posted. > > > > This uses the centos-6 testing key and is available here: > > > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/ > > > > The repo file is here: > > > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/chromium-el6.repo > > > > This version is now called chromium-browser and not chromium, so if you > > have the older version, you will need to: > > > > yum remove chromium > > > > then > > > > yum install chromium-browser > > > > Later updates should happen with yum update and the name chromium-browser > > > > > > Thanks, > > Johnny Hughes > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > Thanks for this Johnny. I'm seeing some strange input related issues with > it however: > > 1. It doesn't detect anything typed on the keypad when NumLock is enabled. > 2. It's not detecting the return key ie. entering text in a search field > and hitting return results in nothing whereas before it would invoke the > search. > > I'd be happy to provide more information if required. > > Thanks, > Cian > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos