Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:14:55 +0200: > Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice > than CentOS 5.3
Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
