On 06/03/2009 01:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Probably the latter. CentOS 5 SP 3 would maybe have been a better choice >> than CentOS 5.3 > > Not if one wants to stay in sync with the RHEL naming scheme :-)
I dont think that will be a problem, since we have never been in sync with Red Hat's naming scheme. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
