On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen <eero.voloti...@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>>
>> VirtManager + RHEL 5/6 does not require use of windows client.
>
> virt-manager is too stupid to be permitted to live outside of an
> intensive care unit. It completely mishandles configuration options
> that are easily available from the command line, such as the use of
> mutliple disk drives at image setup time, and has very poor handling
> of randomized NIC configurations, and it behaves extremely poorly over
> remote X connections. It also has no clue and little capability to
> properly handle pair-bonded connections for high reliability upstream
> connectivity.
>

I'm also waiting (not holding my breath) for clear documentation 
from upstream of which settings are stored in which files.  Or even
documentation that is internally consistent with itself.

say /etc/xen or /etc/libvirt/* or /var/lib/libvirt/*??

Has that been cleaned up and documented?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE       j...@rossberry.com http://www.rossberry.com
"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best
state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one."
Thomas Paine
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Reply via email to