On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Greg Farnum
> <gregory.far...@dreamhost.com (mailto:gregory.far...@dreamhost.com)> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Noah Watkins wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Also need to check that cmount is initialized. I'd add a helper:
> > > > 
> > > > Client *ceph_get_client(struct ceph_mount_info *cmont)
> > > > {
> > > > if (cmount && cmount->is_mounted())
> > > > return cmount->get_client();
> > > > 
> > > > return NULL;
> > > > }
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > How useful is checking cmount != NULL here? This defensive check depends 
> > > on users initializing their cmount pointers to NULL, but the API doesn't 
> > > do anything to require this initialization assumption.
> > > 
> > > - Noah
> > I had a whole email going until I realized you were just right. So, yeah, 
> > that wouldn't do anything since a cmount they forgot to have the API 
> > initialize is just going to hold random data. Urgh.
> 
> 
> 
> There's no destructor either, maybe it's a good time to add one?
> 
> Yehuda 
Actually, there is. The problem is that to the client it's an opaque pointer 
under many(most?) circumstances, so that it can be used by C users. 
-Greg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to