Thanks a lot for this spreadsheet, I’ll check that on but I doubt we store data smaller than the min_alloc size.
Yes we do use an EC pool type of 2+1 with failure_domain being at host level. Le mar. 14 mars 2023 à 19:38, Mark Nelson <mark.a.nel...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Is it possible that you are storing object (chunks if EC) that are > smaller than the min_alloc size? This cheat sheet might help: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rpGfScgG-GLoIGMJWDixEkqs-On9w8nAUToPQjN8bDI/edit?usp=sharing > > Mark > > On 3/14/23 12:34, Gaël THEROND wrote: > > Hi everyone, I’ve got a quick question regarding one of our RadosGW > bucket. > > > > This bucket is used to store docker registries, and the total amount of > > data we use is supposed to be 4.5Tb BUT it looks like ceph told us we > > rather use ~53Tb of data. > > > > One interesting thing is, this bucket seems to shard for unknown reason > as > > it is supposed to be disabled by default, but even taking that into > account > > we’re not supposed to see such a massive amount of additional data isn’t > it? > > > > Here is the bucket stats of it: > > https://paste.opendev.org/show/bdWFRvNFtxyHnbPfXWu9/ > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
