For cephfs, the size reported by 'ls -s' is the same as file size. see http://ceph.com/docs/next/dev/differences-from-posix/
Regards Yan, Zheng On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Jens-Christian Fischer <jens-christian.fisc...@switch.ch> wrote: > > Hi all > > as part of moving our OpenStack VM instance store from dedicated disks on the > physical hosts to a CephFS backed by an SSD pool, we noticed that the files > created on CephFS aren't sparse, even though the original files were. > > This is on > root@s2:~# ls -lhs /var/lib/nova/instances/_base > total 63G > 750M -rw-r--r-- 1 nova nova 2.0G Jul 10 21:40 > 1a11de23fe75a210b4da631366513cb7c22ef311 > 750M -rw-r--r-- 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 10G Jul 10 21:40 > 1a11de23fe75a210b4da631366513cb7c22ef311_10 > … > > vs > > root@s2:~# ls -lhs > /mnt/instances/instances/_base/1a11de23fe75a210b4da631366513cb7c22ef311* > 1.2G -rw-r--r-- 1 nova nova 1.2G Sep 5 16:56 > /mnt/instances/instances/_base/1a11de23fe75a210b4da631366513cb7c22ef311 > 10G -rw-r--r-- 1 libvirt-qemu kvm 10G Jul 10 21:40 > /mnt/instances/instances/_base/1a11de23fe75a210b4da631366513cb7c22ef311_10 > > We have used different ways of copying the files (tar and rsync) and > specified the sparse options: > > # rsync -rtvupogS -h /var/lib/nova/instances/ /mnt/instances/instances > or > # (cd /var/lib/nova/instances ; tar -Svcf - .)|(cd /mnt/instances/instances ; > tar Sxpf -) > > The OSDs we use for this pool are backed by XFS (which has a problem with > sparse files, unless one specifies allocation block size options in the > mounts) > http://serverfault.com/questions/406069/why-are-my-xfs-filesystems-suddenly-consuming-more-space-and-full-of-sparse-file, > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=055388a3188f56676c21e92962fc366ac8b5cb72. > We have mounted the XFS partitions for the OSDs with this option, but I > assume that this shouldn't impact the way CephFS handles sparse files. > > I seem to remember that the copying of sparse files worked a couple of months > ago (ceph-fs kernel 3.5 on btrfs OSDs), but now we used Kernel 3.10 and > recently ceph-fuse to mount the CephFS. > > Are we doing something wrong, or is this not supported by CephFS? > > cheers > jc > > > > > > -- > SWITCH > Jens-Christian Fischer, Peta Solutions > Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland > phone +41 44 268 15 15, direct +41 44 268 15 71 > jens-christian.fisc...@switch.ch > http://www.switch.ch > > http://www.switch.ch/socialmedia > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
