Nick, Where did you read that having more than 1 LUN per target causes stability problems?
I am running 4 LUNs per target. For HA I'm running two linux iscsi target servers that map the same 4 rbd images. The two targets have the same serial numbers, T10 address, etc. I copy the primary's config to the backup and change IPs. This way VMWare thinks they are different target IPs on the same host. This has worked very well for me. One suggestion I have is to try using rbd enabled tgt. The performance is equivalent to LIO, but I found it is much better at recovering from a cluster outage. I've had LIO lock up the kernel or simply not recognize that the rbd images are available; where tgt will eventually present the rbd images again. I have been slowly adding servers and am expanding my test setup to a production setup (nice thing about ceph). I now have 6 OSD hosts with 7 disks on each. I'm using the LSI Nytro cache raid controller, so I don't have a separate journal and have 40Gb networking. I plan to add another 6 OSD hosts in another rack in the next 6 months (and then another 6 next year). I'm doing 3x replication, so I want to end up with 3 racks. Jake On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Giuseppe, > > > > I am working on something very similar at the moment. I currently have it > working on some test hardware but seems to be working reasonably well. > > > > I say reasonably as I have had a few instability’s but these are on the HA > side, the LIO and RBD side of things have been rock solid so far. The main > problems I have had seem to be around recovering from failure with > resources ending up in a unmanaged state. I’m not currently using fencing > so this may be part of the cause. > > > > As a brief description of my configuration. > > > > 4 Hosts each having 2 OSD’s also running the monitor role > > 3 additional host in a HA cluster which act as iSCSI proxy nodes. > > > > I’m using the IP, RBD, iSCSITarget and iSCSILUN resource agents to provide > HA iSCSI LUN which maps back to a RBD. All the agents for each RBD are in a > group so they follow each other between hosts. > > > > I’m using 1 LUN per target as I read somewhere there are stability > problems using more than 1 LUN per target. > > > > Performance seems ok, I can get about 1.2k random IO’s out the iSCSI LUN. > These seems to be about right for the Ceph cluster size, so I don’t think > the LIO part is causing any significant overhead. > > > > We should be getting our production hardware shortly which wil have 40 > OSD’s with journals and a SSD caching tier, so within the next month or so > I will have a better idea of running it in a production environment and the > performance of the system. > > > > Hope that helps, if you have any questions, please let me know. > > > > Nick > > > > *From:* ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com');>] *On > Behalf Of *Giuseppe Civitella > *Sent:* 13 January 2015 11:23 > *To:* ceph-users > *Subject:* [ceph-users] Ceph, LIO, VMWARE anyone? > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm working on a lab setup regarding Ceph serving rbd images as ISCSI > datastores to VMWARE via a LIO box. Is there someone that already did > something similar wanting to share some knowledge? Any production > deployments? What about LIO's HA and luns' performances? > > > > Thanks > > Giuseppe > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
