I really advise removing the bastards becore they die...no rebalancing
hapening just temp osd down while replacing journals...

What size and model are yours Samsungs?
On Sep 3, 2015 7:10 PM, "Quentin Hartman" <qhart...@direwolfdigital.com>
wrote:

> We also just started having our 850 Pros die one after the other after
> about 9 months of service. 3 down, 11 to go... No warning at all, the drive
> is fine, and then it's not even visible to the machine. According to the
> stats in hdparm and the calcs I did they should have had years of life
> left, so it seems that ceph journals definitely do something they do not
> like, which is not reflected in their stats.
>
> QH
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, 10 minus <t10te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> We got a good deal on 843T and we are using it in our Openstack setup
>> ..as journals .
>> They have been running for last six months ... No issues .
>> When we compared with  Intel SSDs I think it was 3700 they  were shade
>> slower for our workload and considerably cheaper.
>> We did not run any synthetic benchmark since we had a specific use case.
>> The performance was better than our old setup so it was good enough.
>>
>> hth
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We have some 850 pro 256gb ssds if anyone interested to buy:)
>>>
>>> And also there was new 850 pro firmware that broke peoples disk which
>>> was revoked later etc... I'm sticking with only vacuum cleaners from
>>> Samsung for now, maybe... :)
>>> On Aug 25, 2015 12:02 PM, "Voloshanenko Igor" <
>>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> To be honest, Samsung 850 PRO not 24/7 series... it's something about
>>>> desktop+ series, but anyway - results from this drives - very very bad in
>>>> any scenario acceptable by real life...
>>>>
>>>> Possible 845 PRO more better, but we don't want to experiment
>>>> anymore... So we choose S3500 240G. Yes, it's cheaper than S3700 (about 2x
>>>> times), and no so durable for writes, but we think more better to replace 1
>>>> ssd per 1 year than to pay double price now.
>>>>
>>>> 2015-08-25 12:59 GMT+03:00 Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> And should I mention that in another CEPH installation we had samsung
>>>>> 850 pro 128GB and all of 6 ssds died in 2 month period - simply disappear
>>>>> from the system, so not wear out...
>>>>>
>>>>> Never again we buy Samsung :)
>>>>> On Aug 25, 2015 11:57 AM, "Andrija Panic" <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> First read please:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are getting 200 IOPS in comparison to Intels3500 18.000 iops -
>>>>>> those are  constant performance numbers, meaning avoiding drives cache 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> running for longer period of time...
>>>>>> Also if checking with FIO you will get better latencies on intel
>>>>>> s3500 (model tested in our case) along with 20X better IOPS results...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We observed original issue by having high speed at begining of i.e.
>>>>>> file transfer inside VM, which than halts to zero... We moved journals 
>>>>>> back
>>>>>> to HDDs and performans was acceptable...no we are upgrading to intel
>>>>>> S3500...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> any details on that ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:42:47 +0200, Andrija Panic
>>>>>> <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Make sure you test what ever you decide. We just learned this the
>>>>>> hard way
>>>>>> > with samsung 850 pro, which is total crap, more than you could
>>>>>> imagine...
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Andrija
>>>>>> > On Aug 25, 2015 11:25 AM, "Jan Schermer" <j...@schermer.cz> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > > I would recommend Samsung 845 DC PRO (not EVO, not just PRO).
>>>>>> > > Very cheap, better than Intel 3610 for sure (and I think it beats
>>>>>> even
>>>>>> > > 3700).
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > Jan
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > > On 25 Aug 2015, at 11:23, Christopher Kunz <
>>>>>> chrisl...@de-punkt.de>
>>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > Am 25.08.15 um 11:18 schrieb Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator:
>>>>>> > > >> Hi,
>>>>>> > > >>
>>>>>> > > >> most of the times I do get the recommendation from resellers
>>>>>> to go with
>>>>>> > > >> the intel s3700 for the journalling.
>>>>>> > > >>
>>>>>> > > > Check out the Intel s3610. 3 drive writes per day for 5 years.
>>>>>> Plus, it
>>>>>> > > > is cheaper than S3700.
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > Regards,
>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>> > > > --ck
>>>>>> > > > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > > > ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>> > > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>>>> > > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > > ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>> > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>>>> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Mariusz Gronczewski, Administrator
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Efigence S. A.
>>>>>> ul. Wołoska 9a, 02-583 Warszawa
>>>>>> T: [+48] 22 380 13 13
>>>>>> F: [+48] 22 380 13 14
>>>>>> E: mariusz.gronczew...@efigence.com
>>>>>> <mailto:mariusz.gronczew...@efigence.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to