The filesystem is xfs everywhere, there are nine hosts. The two new ceph nodes 08, 09 have a new kernel. I didn't see the errors in the tracker on the new nodes, but they were only receiving new data, not migrating it. Jeff
ceph2: Linux ceph2 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph1: Linux ceph1 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph3: Linux ceph3 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph03: Linux ceph03 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph01: Linux ceph01 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph02: Linux ceph02 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph06: Linux ceph06 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph05: Linux ceph05 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph04: Linux ceph04 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph08: Linux ceph08 3.19.0-51-generic #58~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 26 22:02:58 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph07: Linux ceph07 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ceph09: Linux ceph09 3.19.0-51-generic #58~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 26 22:02:58 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> wrote: > What filesystem and kernel are you running on the osds? This (and > your other bug, actually) could be explained by some kind of weird > kernel readdir behavior. > -Sam > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hmm, so much for that theory, still looking. If you can produce > > another set of logs (as before) from scrubbing that pg, it might help. > > -Sam > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdo...@umn.edu> > wrote: > >> they're all the same.....see attached. > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Have you confirmed the versions? > >>> -Sam > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdo...@umn.edu> > wrote: > >>> > I have one other very strange event happening, I've opened a ticket > on > >>> > it: > >>> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14766 > >>> > > >>> > During this migration, OSD failed probably over 400 times while > moving > >>> > data > >>> > around. We move the empty directories and restarted the OSDs. I > >>> > can't > >>> > say if this is related--I have no reason to suspect it is. > >>> > > >>> > Jeff > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> What could cause this kind of unexpected behaviour? > >>> >> Any assumption?? > >>> >> Sorry for interrupting you. > >>> >> > >>> >> Cheers, > >>> >> S > >>> >> > >>> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >>> >> > Hmm, at the end of the log, the pg is still inconsistent. Can you > >>> >> > attach a ceph pg query on that pg? > >>> >> > -Sam > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >>> >> >> If so, that strongly suggests that the pg was actually never > >>> >> >> inconsistent in the first place and that the bug is in scrub > itself > >>> >> >> presumably getting confused about an object during a write. The > >>> >> >> next > >>> >> >> step would be to get logs like the above from a pg as it scrubs > >>> >> >> transitioning from clean to inconsistent. If it's really a race > >>> >> >> between scrub and a write, it's probably just non-deterministic, > you > >>> >> >> could set logging on a set of osds and continuously scrub any pgs > >>> >> >> which only map to those osds until you reproduce the problem. > >>> >> >> -Sam > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> > >>> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >>> So after the scrub, it came up clean? The inconsistent/missing > >>> >> >>> objects reappeared? > >>> >> >>> -Sam > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey McDonald < > jmcdo...@umn.edu> > >>> >> >>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>> Hi Sam, > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> I've done as you requested: > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting > >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> # for i in 307 210 273 191 132 450 ; do > >>> >> >>>>> ceph tell osd.$i injectargs '--debug-osd 20 > --debug-filestore 20 > >>> >> >>>>> --debug-ms 1' > >>> >> >>>>> done > >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 > >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 > >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 > >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 > >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 > >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> # date > >>> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:03:38 CST 2016 > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> # ceph pg deep-scrub 70.459 > >>> >> >>>> instructing pg 70.459 on osd.307 to deep-scrub > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> Scrub finished around > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> # date > >>> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:13:03 CST 2016 > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> I've tar'd+gziped the files which can be downloaded from here. > >>> >> >>>> The > >>> >> >>>> logs > >>> >> >>>> start a minute or two after today at 16:00. > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bzz8TrxFvfema2NQUmotd1BOTnM&usp=sharing > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> Oddly(to me anyways), this pg is now active+clean: > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> # ceph pg dump | grep 70.459 > >>> >> >>>> dumped all in format plain > >>> >> >>>> 70.459 21377 0 0 0 0 64515446306 3088 3088 active+clean > 2016-03-07 > >>> >> >>>> 16:26:57.796537 279563'212832 279602:628151 > >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] > >>> >> >>>> 307 > >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] 307 279563'212832 2016-03-07 > >>> >> >>>> 16:12:30.741984 > >>> >> >>>> 279563'212832 2016-03-07 16:12:30.741984 > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> Regards, > >>> >> >>>> Jeff > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com> > >>> >> >>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> I think the unfound object on repair is fixed by > >>> >> >>>>> d51806f5b330d5f112281fbb95ea6addf994324e (not in hammer > yet). I > >>> >> >>>>> opened http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15002 for the backport > and > >>> >> >>>>> to > >>> >> >>>>> make sure it's covered in ceph-qa-suite. No idea at this time > >>> >> >>>>> why > >>> >> >>>>> the > >>> >> >>>>> objects are disappearing though. > >>> >> >>>>> -Sam > >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Just <sj...@redhat.com > > > >>> >> >>>>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> > The one just scrubbed and now inconsistent. > >>> >> >>>>> > -Sam > >>> >> >>>>> > > >>> >> >>>>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Jeffrey McDonald > >>> >> >>>>> > <jmcdo...@umn.edu> > >>> >> >>>>> > wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> >> Do you want me to enable this for the pg already with > unfound > >>> >> >>>>> >> objects > >>> >> >>>>> >> or the > >>> >> >>>>> >> placement group just scrubbed and now inconsistent? > >>> >> >>>>> >> Jeff > >>> >> >>>>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Samuel Just < > sj...@redhat.com> > >>> >> >>>>> >> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> Can you enable > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug osd = 20 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug filestore = 20 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug ms = 1 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> on all osds in that PG, rescrub, and convey to us the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> resulting > >>> >> >>>>> >>> logs? > >>> >> >>>>> >>> -Sam > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jeffrey McDonald > >>> >> >>>>> >>> <jmcdo...@umn.edu> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Here is a PG which just went inconsistent: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > [307,210,273,191,132,450] > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Attached is the result of a pg query on this. I will > wait > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > for your > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > feedback before issuing a repair. > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > From what I read, the inconsistencies are more likely > the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > result of > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ntp, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > but > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > all nodes have the local ntp master and all are showing > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > sync. > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Regards, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeff > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Gregory Farnum > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > <gfar...@redhat.com> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> [ Keeping this on the users list. ] > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Okay, so next time this happens you probably want to > do a > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> pg > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> query > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> on > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> the PG which has been reported as dirty. I can't help > much > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> beyond > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> that, but hopefully Kefu or David will chime in once > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> there's > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> a > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> little > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> more for them to look at. > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> -Greg > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Jeffrey McDonald > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> <jmcdo...@umn.edu> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Hi Greg, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > I'm running the ceph version hammer, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > ceph version 0.94.5 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > (9764da52395923e0b32908d83a9f7304401fee43) > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > The hardware migration was performed by just setting > the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > crush > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > map to > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > zero > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > for the OSD we wanted to retire. The system was > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > performing > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > poorly > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > with > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > these older OSDs and we had a difficult time > maintaining > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > stability of > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > system. The old OSDs are still there but all of > the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > data > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > is > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > now > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > migrated > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > to new and/or existing hardware. > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeff > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Gregory Farnum > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > <gfar...@redhat.com> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Jeffrey McDonald > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> <jmcdo...@umn.edu> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Hi, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > For a while, we've been seeing inconsistent > placement > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > groups > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > on > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > our > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > erasure > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > coded system. The placement groups go from a > state > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > of > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean+inconsistent after a deep scrub: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044131 7f385d118700 -1 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub stat mismatch, got 21446/21428 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 hit_set_archive, > 0/0 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 hit_set_archive > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044416 7f385d118700 -1 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub 18 missing, 0 inconsistent > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044464 7f385d118700 -1 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 deep-scrub 73 errors > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > So I tell the placement group to perform a repair: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:26.047177 7f385d118700 0 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [INF] : > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair starts > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:57.087291 7f3858b0a700 0 -- > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.2:6874/13937 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.6:6824/8127 pipe(0x2e578000 sd=697 :6874 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The repair finds missing shards and repairs them, > but > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > then I > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > have > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 'unfound objects' : > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.467590 7f385d118700 -1 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair stat mismatch, got 21446/21428 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 hit_set_archive, > 0/0 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 hit_set_archive > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.468358 7f385d118700 -1 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair 18 missing, 0 inconsistent objects > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.469431 7f385d118700 -1 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair 73 errors, 73 fixed > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've traced one of the unfound objects all the way > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > through the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've found that they are not really lost. I can > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > fail > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > over > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > osd > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recover the files. This is happening quite > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > regularly > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > after a > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > large > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > migration of data from old hardware to > new(migration > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > is > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > complete). > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The system sets the PG into 'recovery', but we've > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > seen > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > in > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > a > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recovering state for many days. Should we just > be > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > patient > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or do > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > we > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > need > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to dig further into the issue? > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> You may need to dig into this more, although I'm not > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> sure > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> what > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> the > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> issue is likely to be. What version of Ceph are you > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> running? How > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> did > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> you do this hardware migration? > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> -Greg > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is stuck unclean for 704.803040, current > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+recovering, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > last acting [277,101,218,49,304,412] > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is active+recovering, acting > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [277,101,218,49,304,412], > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > unfound > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > There is no indication of any problems with down > OSDs > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > network > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > issues > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > with > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs. > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Thanks, > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeff > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > -- > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 599 Walter Library email: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 > 625-6905 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 > 624-8861 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > -- > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 599 Walter Library email: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > -- > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 599 Walter Library email: > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users mailing list > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >>> >> >>>>> >>> > > >>> >> >>>>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >> -- > >>> >> >>>>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > >>> >> >>>>> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations > >>> >> >>>>> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > >>> >> >>>>> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities > >>> >> >>>>> >> 599 Walter Library email: > >>> >> >>>>> >> jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu > >>> >> >>>>> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > >>> >> >>>>> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > >>> >> >>>>> >> > >>> >> >>>>> >> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> -- > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > >>> >> >>>> Assistant Director for HPC Operations > >>> >> >>>> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > >>> >> >>>> University of Minnesota Twin Cities > >>> >> >>>> 599 Walter Library email: > jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu > >>> >> >>>> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > >>> >> >>>> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > >>> >> > ceph-users mailing list > >>> >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >>> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Email: > >>> >> shin...@linux.com > >>> >> GitHub: > >>> >> shinobu-x > >>> >> Blog: > >>> >> Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > > >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations > >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities > >>> > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu > >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations > >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities > >> 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu > >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > >> > >> > -- Jeffrey McDonald, PhD Assistant Director for HPC Operations Minnesota Supercomputing Institute University of Minnesota Twin Cities 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdon...@msi.umn.edu 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
