Well, if you can afford a downtime, that's probably a good solution

On 02/01/2017 15:43, Matteo Dacrema wrote:
> Increasing pg_num will lead to several slow requests and cluster freeze, but  
> due to creating pgs operation , for what I’ve seen until now.
> During the creation period all the request are frozen , and the creation 
> period take a lot of time even for 128 pgs.
> 
> I’ve observed that during creation period most of the OSD goes at 100% of 
> their performance capacity. I think that without operation running in the 
> cluster I’ll be able to upgrade pg_num quickly without causing down time 
> several times.
> 
> Matteo
> 
>> Il giorno 02 gen 2017, alle ore 15:02, c...@jack.fr.eu.org ha scritto:
>>
>> Well, as the doc said:
>>> Set or clear the pause flags in the OSD map. If set, no IO requests will be 
>>> sent to any OSD. Clearing the flags via unpause results in resending 
>>> pending requests.
>> If you do that on a production cluster, that means your cluster will no
>> longer be in production :)
>>
>> Depending on your needs, but ..
>> Maybe you want do this operation as fast as possible
>> Or maybe you want to make that operation as transparent as possible,
>> from a user point of view
>>
>> You may have a look at osd_recovery_op_priority &
>> osd_client_op_priority, they might be interesting for you
>>
>> On 02/01/2017 14:37, Matteo Dacrema wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> what happen if I set pause flag on a production cluster?
>>> I mean, will all the request remain pending/waiting or all the volumes 
>>> attached to the VMs will become read-only?
>>>
>>> I need to quickly upgrade placement group number from 3072 to 8192 or 
>>> better to 165336 and I think doing it without client operations will be 
>>> much faster.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> Matteo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>> --
>> Questo messaggio e' stato analizzato con Libra ESVA ed e' risultato non 
>> infetto.
>> Seguire il link qui sotto per segnalarlo come spam: 
>> http://mx01.enter.it/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=9F3C956B85.A333A
>>
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to