> Op 2 januari 2017 om 15:43 schreef Matteo Dacrema <mdacr...@enter.eu>:
> 
> 
> Increasing pg_num will lead to several slow requests and cluster freeze, but  
> due to creating pgs operation , for what I’ve seen until now.
> During the creation period all the request are frozen , and the creation 
> period take a lot of time even for 128 pgs.
> 
> I’ve observed that during creation period most of the OSD goes at 100% of 
> their performance capacity. I think that without operation running in the 
> cluster I’ll be able to upgrade pg_num quickly without causing down time 
> several times.
> 

First, slowly increase pg_num to the number you want, then increase pgp_num in 
small baby steps as well.

Wido

> Matteo
> 
> > Il giorno 02 gen 2017, alle ore 15:02, c...@jack.fr.eu.org ha scritto:
> > 
> > Well, as the doc said:
> >> Set or clear the pause flags in the OSD map. If set, no IO requests will 
> >> be sent to any OSD. Clearing the flags via unpause results in resending 
> >> pending requests.
> > If you do that on a production cluster, that means your cluster will no
> > longer be in production :)
> > 
> > Depending on your needs, but ..
> > Maybe you want do this operation as fast as possible
> > Or maybe you want to make that operation as transparent as possible,
> > from a user point of view
> > 
> > You may have a look at osd_recovery_op_priority &
> > osd_client_op_priority, they might be interesting for you
> > 
> > On 02/01/2017 14:37, Matteo Dacrema wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >> 
> >> what happen if I set pause flag on a production cluster?
> >> I mean, will all the request remain pending/waiting or all the volumes 
> >> attached to the VMs will become read-only?
> >> 
> >> I need to quickly upgrade placement group number from 3072 to 8192 or 
> >> better to 165336 and I think doing it without client operations will be 
> >> much faster.
> >> 
> >> Thanks
> >> Regards
> >> Matteo
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ceph-users mailing list
> >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> > 
> > --
> > Questo messaggio e' stato analizzato con Libra ESVA ed e' risultato non 
> > infetto.
> > Seguire il link qui sotto per segnalarlo come spam: 
> > http://mx01.enter.it/cgi-bin/learn-msg.cgi?id=9F3C956B85.A333A
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to