Hmm :( Even for an Active/Passive configuration? I'm guessing we will need to do something with Pacemaker in the meantime?
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Jason Dillaman <jdill...@redhat.com> wrote: > I can probably say that it won't work out-of-the-gate for Hyper-V > since it most likely will require iSCSI persistent reservations. That > support is still being added to the kernel because right now it isn't > being distributed to all the target portal group nodes. > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Samuel Soulard > <samuel.soul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks! we'll visit back this subject once it is released. Waiting on > this > > to perform some tests for Hyper-V/VMware ISCSI LUNs :) > > > > Sam > > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Jason Dillaman <jdill...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Yes, RHEL/CentOS 7.4 or kernel 4.13 (once it's released). > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Samuel Soulard < > samuel.soul...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Jason, > >> > > >> > Oh the documentation is awesome: > >> > > >> > https://github.com/ritz303/ceph/blob/6ab7bc887b265127510c3c3fde6dba > d0e047955d/doc/rbd/iscsi-target-cli.rst > >> > > >> > So I assume that this is not yet available for CentOS and requires us > to > >> > wait until CentOS 7.4 is released? > >> > > >> > Thanks for the documentation, it makes everything more clear. > >> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Jason Dillaman <jdill...@redhat.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> We are working hard to formalize active/passive iSCSI configuration > >> >> across Linux/Windows/ESX via LIO. We have integrated librbd into > LIO's > >> >> tcmu-runner and have developed a set of support applications to > >> >> managing the clustered configuration of your iSCSI targets. There is > >> >> some preliminary documentation here [1] that will be merged once we > >> >> can finish our testing. > >> >> > >> >> [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16182 > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Samuel Soulard > >> >> <samuel.soul...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Hi all, > >> >> > > >> >> > Platform : Centos 7 Luminous 12.1.2 > >> >> > > >> >> > First time here but, are there any guides or guidelines out there > on > >> >> > how > >> >> > to > >> >> > configure ISCSI gateways in HA so that if one gateway fails, IO can > >> >> > continue > >> >> > on the passive node? > >> >> > > >> >> > What I've done so far > >> >> > -ISCSI node with Ceph client map rbd on boot > >> >> > -Rbd has exclusive-lock feature enabled and layering > >> >> > -Targetd service dependent on rbdmap.service > >> >> > -rbd exported through LUN ISCSI > >> >> > -Windows ISCSI imitator can map the lun and format / write to it > >> >> > (awesome) > >> >> > > >> >> > Now I have no idea where to start to have an active /passive > scenario > >> >> > for > >> >> > luns exported with LIO. Any ideas? > >> >> > > >> >> > Also the web dashboard seem to hint that it can get stats for > various > >> >> > clients made on ISCSI gateways, I'm not sure where it pulls that > >> >> > information. Is Luminous now shipping a ISCSI daemon of some sort? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks all! > >> >> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > ceph-users mailing list > >> >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Jason > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jason > > > > > > > > -- > Jason >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
