Luminous is also not having an updated librgw that prevents ganesha from 
using the multi tenancy mounts. Especially with the current issues of 
mimic, would it be nice if this could be made available in luminous. 

https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users@lists.ceph.com/msg48659.html
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/19358

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik McCormick [mailto:emccorm...@cirrusseven.com] 
Sent: dinsdag 9 oktober 2018 20:49
To: Alfredo Deza
Cc: ceph-users
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] nfs-ganesha version in Ceph repos



On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 1:48 PM Alfredo Deza <ad...@redhat.com> wrote:


        On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:39 PM Erik McCormick
        <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> wrote:
        >
        > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:27 PM Erik McCormick
        > <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> wrote:
        > >
        > > Hello,
        > >
        > > I'm trying to set up an nfs-ganesha server with the Ceph FSAL, 
and
        > > running into difficulties getting the current stable release 
running.
        > > The versions in the Luminous repo is stuck at 2.6.1, whereas 
the
        > > current stable version is 2.6.3. I've seen a couple of HA 
issues in
        > > pre 2.6.3 versions that I'd like to avoid.
        > >
        >
        > I should have been more specific that the ones I am looking for 
are for Centos 7
        
        You mean these repos: http://download.ceph.com/nfs-ganesha/ ?
        


Yes. Specifically
http://download.ceph.com/nfs-ganesha/rpm-V2.6-stable/luminous/x86_64/


Which contains 2.6.1 while current stable upstream is 2.6.3



        >
        > > I've also been attempting to build my own from source, but 
banging my
        > > head against a wall as far as dependencies and config options 
are
        > > concerned.
        > >
        > > If anyone reading this has the ability to kick off a fresh 
build of
        > > the V2.6-stable branch with all the knobs turned properly for 
Ceph, or
        > > can point me to a set of cmake configs and scripts that might 
help me
        > > do it myself, I would be eternally grateful.
        > >
        > > Thanks,
        > > Erik
        > _______________________________________________
        > ceph-users mailing list
        > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
        > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
        


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to