Hi Wido,

Interleaving below....

On 6/11/19 3:10 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> 
> I thought it was resolved, but it isn't.
> 
> I counted all the OMAP values for the GC objects and I got back:
> 
> gc.0: 0
> gc.11: 0
> gc.14: 0
> gc.15: 0
> gc.16: 0
> gc.18: 0
> gc.19: 0
> gc.1: 0
> gc.20: 0
> gc.21: 0
> gc.22: 0
> gc.23: 0
> gc.24: 0
> gc.25: 0
> gc.27: 0
> gc.29: 0
> gc.2: 0
> gc.30: 0
> gc.3: 0
> gc.4: 0
> gc.5: 0
> gc.6: 0
> gc.7: 0
> gc.8: 0
> gc.9: 0
> gc.13: 110996
> gc.10: 111104
> gc.26: 111142
> gc.28: 111292
> gc.17: 111314
> gc.12: 111534
> gc.31: 111956

Casey Bodley mentioned to me that he's seen similar behavior to what
you're describing when RGWs are upgraded but not all OSDs are upgraded
as well. Is it possible that the OSDs hosting gc.13, gc.10, and so forth
are running a different version of ceph?

Eric

-- 
J. Eric Ivancich
he/him/his
Red Hat Storage
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to