On Sep 12, 2014, at 3:17 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbro...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:13:19 -0400 > Rich Brown <richb.hano...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'll sign too. (And I like the 98th percentile measure for each >> direction to give a single number that represents what's happening. It >> could include ping loss rate, as well...) > > I'll sign too. > > The 98th percentile latency is of-cause nice, but we should remember to > keep our request simple. I did try a simple request and got a lukewarm response. You can see the gist of my correspondence with the test companies in https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/2014-September/003517.html Rich > "Dear speedtest.net/speedof.me please add a latency test, that measures > latency during the upload and download test-runs." > > That will be the first baby step, don't make it too complicated for > them, afterwards we can start explaining if we want min/max or 98th > percentile. > > They already have a ping facility, which the only run _before_ starting > the test run. Thus, they should be-able to easily adapt their existing > "ping" code to measure during the test-runs... give then something they > can easily do. > > -- > Best regards, > Jesper Dangaard Brouer > MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat > Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel