On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Jonathan Morton wrote:
On 23 Mar, 2015, at 03:45, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote:
are we running into performance issues with fq_codel? I thought all the
problems were with HTB or ingress shaping.
Cake is, in part, a response to the HTB problem; it is a few percent more
efficient so far than an equivalent HTB+fq_codel combination. It will have a
few other novel features, too.
Bobbie is a response to the ingress-shaping problem. A policer (with no queue)
can be run without involving an IFB device, which we believe has a large
overhead.
Thanks for the clarification, I hadn't put the pieces together to understand
this.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
