Thanks, That's good to know...The whole SFP+ adapter concept has seemed to me
to be a "tweener" in hardware design space. Too many failure points. That said,
I like fiber's properties as a medium for distances.
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 2:31pm, "Joel Wirāmu Pauling"
<j...@aenertia.net> said:
Heat issues you mention with UTP are gone; with the [ 803.bz ]( http://803.bz )
stuff (i.e Base-N).
It was mostly due to the 10G-Base-T spec being old and out of line with the
SFP+ spec ; which led to higher power consumption than SFP+ cages were rated to
draw and aforementioned heat problems; this is not a problem with newer kit.
It went away with the move to smaller silicon processes and now UTP based 10G
in the home devices are more common and don't suffer from the fragility issues
of the earlier copper based 10G spec. The AQC chipsets were the first to
introduce it but most other vendors have finally picked it up after 5 years or
feet dragging.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:16 AM David P. Reed <[ dpr...@deepplum.com ](
mailto:dpr...@deepplum.com )> wrote:
Yes, it's very cheap and getting cheaper.
Since its price fell to the point I thought was cheap, my home has a 10 GigE
fiber backbone, 2 switches in my main centers of computers, lots of 10 GigE
NICs in servers, and even dual 10 GigE adapters in a Thunderbolt 3 external
adapter for my primary desktop, which is a Skull Canyon NUC.
I strongly recommend people use fiber and sfp+ DAC cabling because twisted
pair, while cheaper, actually is problematic at speeds above 1 Gig - mostly due
to power and heat.
BTW, it's worth pointing out that USB 3.1 can handle 10 Gb/sec, too, and USB-C
connectors and cables can carry Thunderbolt at higher rates. Those adapters
are REALLY CHEAP. There's nothing inherently different about the electronics,
if anything, USB 3.1 is more complicate logic than the ethernet MAC.
So the reason 10 GigE is still far more expensive than USB 3.1 is mainly market
volume - if 10 GigE were a consumer product, not a datacenter product, you'd
think it would already be as cheap as USB 3.1 in computers and switches.
Since DOCSIS can support up to 5 Gb/s, I think, when will Internet Access
Providers start offering "Cable Modems" that support customers who want more
than "a full Gig"? Given all the current DOCSIS 3 CMTS's etc. out there, it's
just a configuration change.
So when will consumer "routers" support 5 Gig, 10 Gig?
On Thursday, December 16, 2021 11:20am, "Dave Taht" <[ dave.t...@gmail.com ](
mailto:dave.t...@gmail.com )> said:
> has really got cheap.
>
> [ https://www.tomshardware.com/news/innodisk-m2-2280-10gbe-adapter ](
> https://www.tomshardware.com/news/innodisk-m2-2280-10gbe-adapter )
>
> On the other hand users are reporting issues with actually using
> 2.5ghz cable with this router in particular, halving the achieved rate
> by negotiating 2.5gbit vs negotiating 1gbit.
>
> [ https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=179145#p897836 ](
> https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=179145#p897836 )
>
>
> --
> I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> [ https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org ](
> https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org )
>
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> [ Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net ](
> mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net )
> [ https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel ](
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel )
>_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[ Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net ](
mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net )
[ https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel ](
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel )
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
