Hi Cameron,
You wrote:
> Out of curiosity, is seems that what you are attempting to do is a little
> strange. What is the reason you feel the need to do this? Access is a
Well, I generally defer all network related issues to our rather
overzealous network admin, Net Admin Guy, whose general rule is to have one
box for every application (only slight exaggeration). He advocates with the
n-tier concept ("Cool! another box!" exclaims Net Admin Guy), and off we go.
I'll eventually upgrade our Access to SQL Server for a couple of reasons,
but again, for most of our projects, that's not really necessary.
Net Admin Guy also mentioned that our db should be behind a firewall;
another reason for embracing n-tier. "This sounds practical," says CF Guy.
Due to my lack of knowledge and fear that if I did speak up his funding
would be reduced (better overkill than overload), I remain silent, but would
love to hear more from a performance/security standpoint whether I should
advocate n-tier myself or remain neutral in our fairly low traffic
environment.
Thanks to all for your suggestions!
8-)
Andrew
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
