I guess that wizard just isn't there. I got discoverer on the kingdomality
test:
http://www.cmi-lmi.com/discover.html
And on the keirsey I'm an artist. On the other hand, I think I took the
wrong test with that last one.
> OK... here's my
>
> http://www.cmi-lmi.com/minstrel.html
> Erika
> (with a *K*)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 6:50 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: personality tests..
>
> *shouts back*
>
> Try the Kingdomality test! And see if the two co-incide! :)
> http://www.cmi-lmi.com/kingdomality.html
>
> -Gel
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition it is the
> contingency planning or entailment organizing role that reaches the
highest
> development in INTJs. Entailing or contingency planning is not an
> informative activity, rather it is a directive one in which the planner
> tells others what to do and in what order to do it. As the organizing
> capabilities the INTJs increase so does their inclination to take charge
of
> whatever is going on.
>
> It is in their abilities that INTJs differ from the other NTs, while in
most
> of their attitudes they are just like the others. However there is one
> attitude that sets them apart from other NTs: they tend to be much more
> self-confident than the rest, having, for obscure reasons, developed a
very
> strong will. They are rather rare, comprising no more than, say, one
percent
> of the population. Being very judicious, decisions come naturally to them;
> indeed, they can hardly rest until they have things settled, decided, and
> set. They are the people who are able to formulate coherent and
> comprehensive contingency plans, hence contingency organizers or
> "entailers."
>
> INTJs will adopt ideas only if they are useful, which is to say if they
> work efficiently toward accomplishing the INTJ's well-defined goals.
Natural
> leaders, INTJs are not at all eager to take command of projects or groups,
> preferring to stay in the background until others demonstrate their
> inability to lead. Once in charge, however, INTJs are the supreme
> pragmatists, seeing reality as a crucible for refining their strategies
for
> goal-directed action. In a sense, INTJs approach reality as they would a
> giant chess board, always seeking strategies that have a high payoff, and
> always devising contingency plans in case of error or adversity. To the
> INTJ, organizational structure and operational procedures are never
> arbitrary, never set in concrete, but are quite malleable and can be
> changed, improved, streamlined. In their drive for efficient action, INTJs
> are the most open-minded of all the types. No idea is too far-fetched to
be
> entertained-if it is useful. INTJs are natural brainstormers, always open
to
> new concepts and, in fact, aggressively seeking them. They are also alert
to
> the consequences of applying new ideas or positions. Theories which cannot
> be made to work are quickly discarded by the INTJs. On the other hand,
INTJs
> can be quite ruthless in implementing effective ideas, seldom counting
> personal cost in terms of time and energy.
> -------------------------------------
>
> To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of
> self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple
> arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than
a
> general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that
> most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own
areas
> of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell
you
> almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs
> know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what
they
> don't know.
> INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving
> upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming
> chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so
> characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion
> "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the
> prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of
> mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or
> sentiment for its own sake.
>
> INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part
> because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and
> reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them
> the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and
disregard
> for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both
> themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be
> "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will
> generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it
upon
> themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their
> supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be
scrupulous
> and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have
> gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which
others
> might not even notice.
>
> In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know".
Typical
> INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be
> found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required
> (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management
positions
> when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well
as
> enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for
> privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of
> surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.
>
> Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's
> Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually
a
> select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a
> relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so
successful
> in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal
> situations.
>
> This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social
> rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less
> understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most
types
> consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are
> usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as
> well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most
> fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make
> sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that
> of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and
empathy
> from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible
> reasonability and directness.
>
> Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their
> intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship.
> Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that
many
> Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by
> synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice,
turn
> of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and
> directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those
> they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become
> established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness,
> stability, and good communications.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Judith Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Hmm. I tested as an NF (Idealist.)
>
> "Idealists, as a temperament, are passionately concerned with personal
> growth and development. Idealists strive to discover who they are and how
> they can become their best possible self--always this quest for
> self-knowledge and self-improvement drives their imagination. And they
want
> to help others make the journey. Idealists are naturally drawn to working
> with people, and whether in education or counseling, in social services or
> personnel work, in journalism or the ministry, they are gifted at helping
> others find their way in life, often inspiring them to grow as individuals
> and to fulfill their potentials."
>
> Sounds good to me!!
>
> Anyone else get that?
>
>
> Judith
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
