Got it. I'm a EITP. Think part Q and part Wile E. Coyote. Yep, they've got
my number. :)
http://typelogic.com/entp.html
> I guess that wizard just isn't there. I got discoverer on the kingdomality
> test:
> http://www.cmi-lmi.com/discover.html
> And on the keirsey I'm an artist. On the other hand, I think I took the
> wrong test with that last one.
>
>
> > OK... here's my
> >
> > http://www.cmi-lmi.com/minstrel.html
> > Erika
> > (with a *K*)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 6:50 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: personality tests..
> >
> > *shouts back*
> >
> > Try the Kingdomality test! And see if the two co-incide! :)
> > http://www.cmi-lmi.com/kingdomality.html
> >
> > -Gel
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition it is the
> > contingency planning or entailment organizing role that reaches the
> highest
> > development in INTJs. Entailing or contingency planning is not an
> > informative activity, rather it is a directive one in which the planner
> > tells others what to do and in what order to do it. As the organizing
> > capabilities the INTJs increase so does their inclination to take charge
> of
> > whatever is going on.
> >
> > It is in their abilities that INTJs differ from the other NTs, while in
> most
> > of their attitudes they are just like the others. However there is one
> > attitude that sets them apart from other NTs: they tend to be much more
> > self-confident than the rest, having, for obscure reasons, developed a
> very
> > strong will. They are rather rare, comprising no more than, say, one
> percent
> > of the population. Being very judicious, decisions come naturally to
them;
> > indeed, they can hardly rest until they have things settled, decided,
and
> > set. They are the people who are able to formulate coherent and
> > comprehensive contingency plans, hence contingency organizers or
> > "entailers."
> >
> > INTJs will adopt ideas only if they are useful, which is to say if they
> > work efficiently toward accomplishing the INTJ's well-defined goals.
> Natural
> > leaders, INTJs are not at all eager to take command of projects or
groups,
> > preferring to stay in the background until others demonstrate their
> > inability to lead. Once in charge, however, INTJs are the supreme
> > pragmatists, seeing reality as a crucible for refining their strategies
> for
> > goal-directed action. In a sense, INTJs approach reality as they would a
> > giant chess board, always seeking strategies that have a high payoff,
and
> > always devising contingency plans in case of error or adversity. To the
> > INTJ, organizational structure and operational procedures are never
> > arbitrary, never set in concrete, but are quite malleable and can be
> > changed, improved, streamlined. In their drive for efficient action,
INTJs
> > are the most open-minded of all the types. No idea is too far-fetched to
> be
> > entertained-if it is useful. INTJs are natural brainstormers, always
open
> to
> > new concepts and, in fact, aggressively seeking them. They are also
alert
> to
> > the consequences of applying new ideas or positions. Theories which
cannot
> > be made to work are quickly discarded by the INTJs. On the other hand,
> INTJs
> > can be quite ruthless in implementing effective ideas, seldom counting
> > personal cost in terms of time and energy.
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> > To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of
> > self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple
> > arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather
than
> a
> > general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems
that
> > most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own
> areas
> > of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell
> you
> > almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how.
INTJs
> > know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what
> they
> > don't know.
> > INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for
improving
> > upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from
becoming
> > chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism
so
> > characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion
> > "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the
> > prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence
of
> > mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or
> > sentiment for its own sake.
> >
> > INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part
> > because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and
> > reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for
them
> > the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and
> disregard
> > for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both
> > themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be
> > "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will
> > generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it
> upon
> > themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their
> > supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be
> scrupulous
> > and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have
> > gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which
> others
> > might not even notice.
> >
> > In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know".
> Typical
> > INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be
> > found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required
> > (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management
> positions
> > when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as
well
> as
> > enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for
> > privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of
> > surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.
> >
> > Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's
> > Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others
(usually
> a
> > select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on
a
> > relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so
> successful
> > in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal
> > situations.
> >
> > This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social
> > rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less
> > understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most
> types
> > consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs
are
> > usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive
as
> > well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the
most
> > fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make
> > sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling
that
> > of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and
> empathy
> > from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible
> > reasonability and directness.
> >
> > Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their
> > intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship.
> > Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that
> many
> > Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by
> > synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice,
> turn
> > of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and
> > directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those
> > they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become
> > established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness,
> > stability, and good communications.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Judith Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > Hmm. I tested as an NF (Idealist.)
> >
> > "Idealists, as a temperament, are passionately concerned with personal
> > growth and development. Idealists strive to discover who they are and
how
> > they can become their best possible self--always this quest for
> > self-knowledge and self-improvement drives their imagination. And they
> want
> > to help others make the journey. Idealists are naturally drawn to
working
> > with people, and whether in education or counseling, in social services
or
> > personnel work, in journalism or the ministry, they are gifted at
helping
> > others find their way in life, often inspiring them to grow as
individuals
> > and to fulfill their potentials."
> >
> > Sounds good to me!!
> >
> > Anyone else get that?
> >
> >
> > Judith
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
