What I think is the issue here is more to do with complexity of design.
When you move to extremely complex data models you end up developing a
large number of backend and middleware components with some frontend
delivery, interfacing with a number of different systems. I don't believe
CF is designed for that market.
I'm not saying it isn't possible, but once you get teams of developers
(20+) working for a couple of years on a project, you cannot tell me that
CF is where you want to place most of your business logic.
But most CF projects I know run in at under 3 man months work. In this
area, CF shines.
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Angél_Stewart [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 May 2001 12:39
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CF Scalability ?
Umm...
...jsp is better suited to Enterprise level solutions..and perhaps this is
what he meant? :)
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: Exposure.com CF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hopefully Macromedia has excused Philip Costa from further employment after
a statement like that!!
His name sounds familiar, so I hope I'm not berating someone we all
appreciate, but how could such a quote be given to PC Magazine? ... by
someone who is hired to evangelize our favorite product - a product we all
work hard to defend day in and day out?
Thanks, Tim
Timothy M. Dineen
CEO.Developer
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.exposure.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
