No, your disagreeing with homosexuality isn't the offensive part.  The fact
that you would like an amendment to our constitution that would limit their
rights is what is offensive to me.  

In some of your other replies though, I see that you would be fine with
removing "marriage" from the government and having "civil unions" be the
legal term for all couples.  This I can agree with also.  

Of course, just because the government won't call it marriage, it doesn't
mean that homosexual's won't call their unions marriages.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monique Boea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 10:43 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
>
> if disagreeing with homosexuality is offensive then
>
> I don't know what to say
>
> Sorry.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 11:05 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
>
>
> Ahhh, okay, so all we pay attention to is the new testament.  Okay, so
> now
> we're even limiting it to a lesser portion of the population that can
> decide
> how the rest of the country should live.
>
> My point in posting the previous message was that people take a lot of
> different things from the bible.  We can't possibly create legislation
based
> on it.  We're sure to exclude/offend/alienate/oppress somebody if that's
> the
> rule we're going to legislate from.
>
> I'm sorry I offended you, but to be truthful, most of your posts on this
> subject have been offensive to me.
>
> Marlon
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Monique Boea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 8:05 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
> >
> > Old Testament and that was very offensive.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 11:59 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
> >
> >
> > So, I guess if we're going to live by the bible, I guess we can all
start
> > having slaves again!
> >
> > http://www.carm.org/questions/slavery.htm
> >
> >       Slavery was permitted in the Bible because of sin in the world.
It
> > existed before the Jews were formed as a nation and it existed after
> > Israel
> > was conquered.  God allows many things to happen in the world such
> as
> > storms, famine, murder, etc.  Slavery, like divorce, is not preferred by
> > God.  Instead, it is allowed.  Where many nations treated their slaves
> very
> > badly, the Bible gave many rights and privileges to slaves.  So, even
> > though
> > it isn't the best way to deal with people, because God has allowed
> man
> > freedom, slavery then exists.  God instructed the Israelites to treat
them
> > properly.
> >
> >     * The Bible acknowledged the slave's status as the property of the
> > master (Ex. 21:23; Lev. 25:46),
> >     * The Bible restricted the master's power over the slave. Ex.
21:20).
> >     * The slave was a member of the master's household (Lev. 22:11)
> >     * The slave was required to rest on the Sabbath (Exodus 20:10; Deut.
> > 5:14)
> >     * The slave was required and to participate in religious observances
> > (Gen. 17:13; Exodus 12:44; Lev. 22:11).
> >     * The Bible prohibited extradition of slaves and granted them asylum
> > (Deut. 23:16-17).
> >     * The servitude of a Hebrew debt-slave was limited to six years (Ex.
> > 21:2; Deut. 15:12).
> >     * When a slave was freed, he was to receive gifts that enabled him
> to
> > survive economically (Deut. 15:14)
> >
> >      The reality of slavery cannot be denied.  Slaves were "slave labor
> > played a minor economic role in the ancient Near East, for privately
> > owned
> > slaves functioned more as domestic servants than as an agricultural or
> > industrial labor force."1
> >
> > But on another note, why should the *bible* have any influence on the
> > government regulating marriage?
> >
> > Marlon
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Monique Boea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:10 PM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
> > >
> > > Sorry, sending again...
> > >
> > > hopefully w/o the HTML junk
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all
> > ungodliness
> > > and unrighteousness of people39 who suppress the truth by their40
> > > unrighteousness,41 1:19 because what can be known about God is
> > plain
> > > to
> > > them,42 because God has made it plain to them. 1:20 For since the
> > > creation
> > > of the world his invisible attributes-his eternal power and divine
> > > nature-have been clearly seen, because they are understood
> through
> > > what has
> > > been made. So people43 are without excuse. 1:21 For although they
> > > knew God,
> > > they did not glorify him as God or give him thanks, but they became
> > > futile
> > > in their thoughts and their senseless hearts44 were darkened. 1:22
> > > Although
> > > they claimed45 to be wise, they became fools 1:23 and exchanged
> > the
> > > glory of
> > > the immortal God for an image resembling mortal human beings46 or
> > > birds or
> > > four-footed animals47 or reptiles.
> > >
> > > 1:24 Therefore God gave them over48 in the desires of their hearts to
> > > impurity, to dishonor49 their bodies among themselves.50 1:25 They51
> > > exchanged the truth of God for a lie52 and worshiped and served
> the
> > > creation53 rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.
> > >
> > > 1:26 For this reason God gave them over to dishonorable passions. For
> > > their
> > > women exchanged the natural sexual relations for unnatural ones,54
> > 1:27
> > > and
> > > likewise the men also abandoned natural relations with women55
> and
> > > were
> > > inflamed in their passions56 for one another. Men57 committed
> > > shameless acts
> > > with men and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
> > >
> > > 1:28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God,58 God
> gave
> > > them
> > > over to a depraved mind, to do what should not be done.59 1:29
> They
> > > are
> > > filled60 with every kind of unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness,
> > > malice. They are rife with61 envy, murder, strife, deceit, hostility.
> They
> > > are gossips, 1:30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant,
> boastful,
> > > contrivers of all sorts of evil, disobedient to parents, 1:31
senseless,
> > > covenant-breakers,62 heartless, ruthless. 1:32 Although they fully
> > know63
> > > God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve
> to
> > > die,64
> > > they not only do them but also approve of those who practice
> them.65
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >   _____
> >
> >
> >
> >
>   _____
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to