Lets look at it the other way:
a 50 cal is only a half an inch.
Or to rephrase it:
HOW MANLY IS A HALF-INCH YOU MISERABLE LITTLE WIMP. THAT'S MICROSCOPIC.
larry
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:41:08 -0400, Jerry Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that's a 157!
>
> (O.K., a 1.57 caliber, but still...)
>
> My numbers are still bigger.
> Jerry Johnson
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/21/04 11:28AM >>>
> No, no, no, Jerry...
>
> 40 mm is only 1.5 inches or so. Now what sounds bigger?
>
> <small_voice>
> An inch and a half, good sir.
> </small_voice>
>
> or
>
> <manly>
> FORTY MASSIVE MILLIMETERS, AH HA HA HA!
> </manly>
>
> - Jim
>
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Matthew Small
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Kevin Graeme
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jerry Johnson
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jerry Johnson
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jim Campbell
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question G
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jerry Johnson
- FireFox !!! Larry C. Lyons
- FireFox !!! Jacob
- RE: FireFox !!! Angel Stewart
- RE: FireFox !!! Marlon Moyer
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Jerry Johnson
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question S . Isaac Dealey
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Timothy Heald
- RE: Assault Weapons Ban Question Marwan Saidi
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Assault Weapons Ban Question Matt Blatchley