The US Supreme Court said that the Florida courts overstepped their bounds
and did not have the authority to make that ruling based on the
Constitution.
In fact the US Supreme Court merely sent the case back to the Florida court
to review, it found that their reason for allowing the recounts was not
Constitutional and that they must issue a ruling that satisfied the
constitution.
_____
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:25 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Electoral College/DNC
Negative. Florida law, already established in a previous decision, was
that the intent of the voter should be the overriding factor. The
Supreme Court decision said forget that, obviously Bush won and we
don't have to count these votes :)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- RE: DNC Jim Davis
- Re: DNC dana tierney
- RE: DNC Jim Davis
- Electoral College G
- Re: Electoral College/DNC Bill Wheatley
- Re: Electoral College/DNC Howie Hamlin
- Re: Electoral College/DNC G
- RE: Electoral College/DNC Sandy Clark
- RE: Electoral College/DNC Sam Morris
- Re: Electoral College/DNC dana tierney
- Re: Electoral College/DNC Nick McClure
- Re: Electoral College/DNC dana tierney
- RE: Electoral College/DNC Nick McClure
- Re: Electoral College/DNC dana tierney
- Re: Electoral College/DNC Doug White
- Re: Electoral College/DNC dana tierney
- Re: Electoral College/DNC Sam Morris
- RE: Electoral College/DNC Nick McClure
- RE: Electoral College/DNC Andy Ousterhout
- Re: Electoral College/DNC dana tierney
- RE: Electoral College/DNC Andy Ousterhout