you have to admit though in some cases (probably not yours) it would
be a eunuch solution.

larry

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:44:48 -0500, brobborb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well....Democracy at it's most basic definition!
>
> but yeah Semi Sarcastic. :)
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Larry C. Lyons
>  To: CF-Community
>  Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:46 AM
>  Subject: Re: Religious oppression in action
>
>  Is it? I hope you were being sarcastic. If you were not then if the
>  majority decided that you ought to become a eunuch, you'd agree with
>  the decision then.
>
>  Isn't the tyranny of the majority grand?
>
>  larry
>
>  On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:15:52 -0500, brobborb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Obviously, there was enough religious people there to invoke such a law.
>  >
>  > Democracy at work.  I'm fine with it.
>  >
>  > :)
>  >  ----- Original Message -----
>  >  From: John Stanley
>  >  To: CF-Community
>  >  Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:21 AM
>  >  Subject: Religious oppression in action
>  >
>  >  Yes, that's right I was forced by laws written in the past to conform to
>  >  someone elses religious views. I went into the local liquor store yesterday
>  >  to get some cokes and some Newcastle Brown Ale, and upon trying to check out
>  >  was informed that I could not buy the beer until after noon (it was
>  >  11:35am).
>  >
>  >  This law had to have been written out of "respect" for church going people,
>  >  or as a way to keep people from participating in imbibing while the rest of
>  >  the poor suckers were stuck in church. It would also explain why you cannot
>  >  sell alcohol from 9pm on Christmas Eve until 7am on the day after Christmas.
>  >
>  >  Get these laws off the books. They are crap and we do not need them. Next
>  >  thing you know, I will not be able to recite the pledge of allegience in
>  >  school without having to, oh wait; or I wont be able to look at the money in
>  >  my wallet without having to be oppressed. and before you bitch that it's
>  >  okay for "god" to be on there, tell me how you feel if it instead said "In
>  >  Loki we trust", or "In Allah we trust". it's bs and everyone knows it.
>  >
>  >  This gags me, as you can probably tell.
>  >
>  >  --unrelated to rant above except for the religion bashing -- ;-)
>  >
>  >  I heard on NPR a story today about an amendment to the KY constitution being
>  >  voted on about the gay marriage thing. They actually interviewed a woman in
>  >  support of banning it who went on and on about how we are not living the way
>  >  god intended us to and that the further we get away from god, the more
>  >  things get screwed up. Has she even studied history? Perhaps we can go back
>  >  to burning people for herasy or for casting spells upon their neighbors.
>  >  Maybe we can go after scientists for claiming that the earth is round. The
>  >  further we move away from "it", the more tolerant of other people society as
>  >  a whole gets. Whatever label you put on it, whatever nice picture you paint
>  >  on it's face you cannot hide the centuries of fallacies and intolerance
>  >  inherent in most religions, especially amd most specifically the "dominant"
>  >  religion here in the US.
>  >
>  >  Boy, I am in a pissy mood today....
>  >
>  >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to