i know it does. You said
"notify(theplayer, tprintf("FIELDNAME %s",field->name))"

So i was just saying nobody is affected any differently then they were before the amendment was passed.

William Wheatley
Coldfusion Guru

    Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: dana tierney
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 5:13 PM
  Subject: Re: No gay marriage in Missouri

  ::shrug::: just cause they couldn't do it before doesn't mean that the
  law doesn't specifically single out a group based on gender.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:08:57 -0400
  Subject: Re: No gay marriage in Missouri
  To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  well it doesn't really stop anyone in missouri they couldn't get
  married before could they?
  I think they just didn't want mayors to start marrying gay couples
  like happened in other cities.

  I mean i know its inconviencing people but it is not like they could
  get married before. The day they finally ALLOW it nationwide will be a
  day to finally be happy.

  William Wheatley
  Coldfusion Guru

      Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
  for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: dana tierney
    To: CF-Community
    Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 5:01 PM
    Subject: Re: No gay marriage in Missouri

    it sounds like gender-based dsicrimination to me....so yeah, I think
    this will be found unconstitutional eventually. Eventually sometimes
    takes a very long time however, so this is cold comfort to anyone
    affected by this law.

    Dana

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Bill Wheatley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:28:29 -0400
    Subject: Re: No gay marriage in Missouri
    To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

    I would suspect its eventually over turned by saying that it violates
    the constitution.

    My rationale is that if it was constitutional to stop gays from
    marrying congress would have just passed a law banning gay marriage.
    But since we all know that law wouldn't stand upto the supreme court
    they floated the idea of a constitutional amendment.
    To quote the simpsons "Now we can make all sorts of crazy laws!"

    William Wheatley
    Coldfusion Guru

        Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
    for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Phill B
      To: CF-Community
      Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 10:18 AM
      Subject: Re: No gay marriage in Missouri

      What are the odds of that?

      I know that federal laws override state laws. How does it work with
      the state constitution?

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Bill Wheatley

      i'm sure the supreme court will weight in or the state consitutional
      amendments and strike them down
  EVENTUALLY.________________________________________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to