By that definition half of the activists in NY would be dead.
-Kevin
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:28:48 -0500, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
>
> There is some wiggle room in that definition, but i think its clear cut enough that you can make a legal distinction between terrorists and non terrorists.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Russia vs Terrorism John Stanley
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Howie Hamlin
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Larry C. Lyons
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism Angel Stewart
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism John Stanley
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism John Stanley
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Howie Hamlin
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Jochem van Dieten
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism G
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Kevin Graeme
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Jochem van Dieten
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism dana tierney
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Howie Hamlin
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism Angel Stewart
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism Angel Stewart
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Russia vs Terrorism Angel Stewart
- Re: Russia vs Terrorism dana tierney