Well, if your not trying to argue, then why bother? <g>
I don't agree with Bush's spending side. I don't believe that Kerry will show
more discipline here, however.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I agree on fiscal discipline tied to smaller government. However, I don't
know how you do that without lowering taxes ahead of spending to starve the
fire or at least reduce the fuel to it."
You don't think that's putting the cart before the horse? You reduce
spending then you reduce taxes because you don't need that much money
anymore. Hold on.. I guess if even if you reduce taxes first then reduce
spending that's fine too. But not reduce taxes then increase spending. it
doesn't come out right on the balance sheets. It does not seem that Mr. Bush
thinks that spending money the country does not have is much to worry about.
The politics aside. isn't he approving the expenditure of more money than
the country has? This from when the country at least has spending surpluses
with which it was trying to pay down the national debt?
I'm not trying to start an argument.
- Matt Small
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- TAXES Andy Ousterhout
- RE: TAXES Sandy Clark
- RE: TAXES Andy Ousterhout
- Re: TAXES Marlon Moyer
- RE: TAXES Andy Ousterhout
- RE: TAXES Matthew Small
- Lower Taxes First?? (was Re: T... Andy Ousterhout
- Lower Taxes First?? (was Re: TAXES... Gruss Gott
- Re: Lower Taxes First?? (was Re: T... Won Lee
- Re: Lower Taxes First?? (was R... Gruss Gott
- Re: TAXES Deanna Schneider
- RE: TAXES Jerry Johnson
- RE: TAXES Tangorre, Michael
- RE: TAXES Ian Skinner