I'm starting to wonder. FWIW I have seen an analysis like Gruss'
before. I am thinking it was Woodward doing Cheney but I am not where
I can look it up right now.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:31:05 -0400
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fox Mulder?
----- Original Message -----
From: dana tierney
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: It's for the oil
erm, whom do we believe?
Dana________________________________
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- It's for the oil Gruss Gott
- RE: It's for the oil Angel Stewart
- Re: It's for the oil Howie Hamlin
- Re: It's for the oil Gruss Gott
- Re: It's for the oil Michael Dinowitz
- Re: It's for the oil dana tierney
- Re: It's for the oil Howie Hamlin
- RE: It's for the oil dana tierney
- RE: It's for the oil Michael Dinowitz
- Re: It's for the oil dana tierney
- Re: It's for the oil (WOT) Gruss Gott
- Re: It's for the oil Robert Munn
- Re: It's for the oil dana tierney
- Re: It's for the oil Robert Munn
- Re: It's for the oil dana tierney
- Re: It's for the oil Sam Morris
- Re: It's for the oil Gruss Gott
- Re: It's for the oil Sam Morris