to it and had the time, they could research, test, and prove the
scientific theories. On the other hand, no matter how much time,
work, or research you put into it, you'd not be able to prove there
is/isn't a god. That's where the difference remains.
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:32:40 -0400, Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 14:21 9/29/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> >If the data adequately supported the conclusions, and were considered
> >to do so by the relevant scientific community, then I would
> >tentatively accept the conclusions. The watchword is tentatively.
> >Otherwise I freely admit it would be beyond me and goes into the realm
> >of Don't Know.
>
> OK so you have made a decision to tentatively accept the conclusion of one
> scientist based on the recommendation of another group of scientist.
> That sure sounds like you have FAITH in that group of scientist. Or maybe
> you have FAITH in the verification process the scientist's ideas go through.
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
