If the data adequately supported the conclusions, and were considered
to do so by the relevant scientific community, then I would
tentatively accept the conclusions. The watchword is tentatively.
Otherwise I freely admit it would be beyond me and goes into the realm
of Don't Know.
larry
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:09:54 -0400, Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 14:00 9/29/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> >When I reach that point you refer to I educate myself until such a
> >point that I cannot go any further and recognize it. For those other
> >fields, I do recognize that they are not my area, so my comments are
> >not necessarily valid.
>
> Doesn't matter if your comments are valid or not. Would you accept such a
> scientific statement to be a reasonable valid?
> If you do how can you explain that?
>
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Here we go again.... Won Lee
- Re: Here we go again.... Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Here we go again.... Kevin Graeme
- RE: Here we go again.... Won Lee
- RE: Here we go again.... Jim Davis
- RE: Here we go again.... Won Lee
- RE: Here we go again.... Jim Davis
- RE: Here we go again.... Won Lee
- Re: Here we go again.... Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Here we go again.... Won Lee
- Re: Here we go again.... Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Here we go again.... Won Lee
- Re: Here we go again.... Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Here we go again.... Marlon Moyer
- RE: Here we go again.... Michael Dinowitz
- Re: Here we go again.... Larry C. Lyons
- RE: Here we go again.... Michael Dinowitz
- Re: Here we go again.... G
- Re: Here we go again.... Ray Champagne
- RE: Here we go again.... Michael Dinowitz
- RE: Here we go again.... Ray Champagne