Actually Dana, I don't even remember how this came to be a topic of discussion. I just got caught up in the double standard.
It is only important as an indicator of Kerry's character if: 1. He is denying he said that 2. He lied in what he said 3. He was wrong in what he said because he did not research the statements Outside of that, I could care less. And at this point, I don't see any of 1-3 being true. Andy -----Original Message----- From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 6:10 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Kerry's Testimony what if he did believe it? Don't you think that this would be something it was important to bring to people's attention? On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:03:00 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dana: > I have no probably holding Bush responsible. I also hold Kerry responsible. > No excuses. If he didn't believe it, he shouldn't have said it. If he did > believe it, then he should be willing to stand buy it. > > Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 4:57 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Kerry's Testimony > > the difference, Andy, is that Bush was president and therefore was > responsible for the corporate culture of the CIA in his > administration. The buck stops here and all that. Kerry was a private > citizen at the time of his testimony and merely reported what he had > been told. > > Dana > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:29:44 -0500, Andy Ousterhout > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Give that man a silver dollar! If one wishes to hold Bush responsible for > > what he read and did, then the same should be applied to Kerry. Saying it > > is > > not Kerry's responsibility because a) he didn't write it and b) it was > > congress' job to decide what is truth is working hard to avoid the realty > of > > the man. > > > > Andy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:18 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Kerry's Testimony > > > > Is that a joke? Isn't that exactly what happened with the State of the > > Union speech and all the other rhetoric involving WMDs in Iraq? > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Andy Ousterhout > > To: CF-Community > > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:12 PM > > Subject: RE: Kerry's Testimony > > > > With your logic, a president could read a report from someone to the > > public and not > > be held responsible for it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes by Ben Forta http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:131557 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
