Awesome so by that logic President Bush needs to be held responsible for acting on "faulty intel" he got?
About time someone finally figured out what i was saying that the buck stops with the president. Though my personal opnion is that it wasn't faulty intel at all. On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:12:41 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry. That dog don't hunt. I believe in personal responsibility. > Especially in testimony before Congress or any other official function. > With > your logic, a president could read a report from someone to the public and > not > be held responsible for it. > > And how and why did this transition to Mary Cheney? Why do the democrats > seem > so fixated on her sexual preferences? > -----Original Message----- > From: Gruss Gott > > > Andy wrote: > > He read it. He didn't challenge it. Therefore, he took responsibility > for > > That doesn't follow (non sequitur). In the context Mr. Kerry was > actiing in, it wasn't his responsibility to investigate or check the > veracity of the claims; he was simply reporting them. That is, he was > telling Congress what he heard, not what he thought to be > true.________________________________ > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=34 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:131599 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
