> Robert wrote: > The plot thickens.... Somewhat, but I still say the issue is, shouldn't the Pentgon know immediately what happened at Al Qaqaa? That is, if the IAEA tagged this site and the US knew about it, doesn't the fact that nobody can really account for the HE say it all?
For example, let's say you go to the bank and ask to withdraw your money. The teller says, "we know at one point we were aware of your money, and there's things to suggest you may have withdrawn it earlier, but right now we really don't know where it is." And then 4 days later a teller shows up and says, "I do remember his money and I did move some of it, but I don't know anything else besides that." Wouldn't that indicate that the bank has a policy problem? That's my point, the fact that the Pentagon can't account for what happened at this IAEA tagged site tells me there's a policy problem. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=36 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:133375 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
