I wasn't trying to say it suited you my arguement is that programers in general get too complacent with thier little world and all to often do not venture out enough. I was not trying to make a personal attack on you or anyone just more a general observation. Your comments just inspired it...
As for real time, I suppose it all depends on what you want inreal time. With MX you can really leverage Java to do some amazong things. I think Blackstone will enhance that even more. Adam H On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 08:29:45 -0500, Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam Haskell wrote: > > > > See this reply right here is one reason certain languages suceed and > > certain languages fail. The fact that you don't even know what > > Blackstone is or does is a shame. How can you say none of your cleitns > > will benifit from CFMX do you even really know what you can offer with > > MX? I am not implying or saying you don't I am seriously asking. How > > can you say you never bother to use MX b/c your clients don;t need > > it..How can you judge a product without using it. We use CF 5 here but > > I still learn everything I can about MX and now Blacstone simpley b/c > > if I don;t one day maybe out company will want to do something with > > Webservices and we'll all move to Java b/c well CF 5 doesn't support > > it, well if I had learned about MX I would know just how powerful and > > EASY webservices arein MX. Never ever be happy with where you are > > don't just learn other programing languages..learn the ones you use > > MORE. Right now I am developing in 3 ( 4 if you include one I can't > > talk about) different CF enviroments and I'll probably pickup Railo > > soon enough to play with it. > > > > Because I work for a financial company. Somewhere down the line I have > to do something very significant in real time. CF is not the tool for > real time applications. More over, I'm locked into certain technologies > (Java and .NET) because a)choices we've made with vendors and/or b) > mutual choices we made with our clients. > > I also haven't heard of anyone using CF for what I do. I mean there > could be someone out there...but I highly doubt it. Mostly because of > the real time nature. I'm not saying CF isn't an Enterprise level > application server. I have made some very large websites with CF. > > -- > 2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:134459 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
