I know there are options, I was merely pointing out that for most home users (probably all 10 of the insecure AP's mentioned before) they are hard to track down (if they know these things exist in the first place) and even harder to implement.
What wireless networking needs is a cross-platform standard, easy to set up, and comes supplied on all clients and AP's. While wireless security remains a ball ache, wireless networks will stay insecure and consequently under used. -- Jay > -----Original Message----- > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 November 2004 14:51 > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Wireless Networks > > James Smith wrote: > > The problem is a lot of clients STILL don't support WPA, even the > > latest generations of iPAQ don't feature it. > > Then use the 802.1x + EAP-TTLS + TKIP + MIC: http://www.securew2.com/ > > Jochem > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135927 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
