No I said most people don't hold to one of these views hard and fast, for most it's been a combination of viewpoints.
And also these are the people that favor overt military action over diplomacy. That was the question I was answering: "Well I'm not of the opinion that overt projection of Force and a rejection of Diplomacy is the right way to go. Therefore I'm going to have a hard time trying to understand why there are those that do. A few of the reasons that I have gathered from talking to a variety of Americans seem to be:" Therefore the moderate viewpoints, or those that I agree with, aren't listed. -Gel -----Original Message----- From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am getting the impression that this is a sore subject. Gel, your post didn't really come across as a question. Larry, I don't think he is saying all Americans are jerks. I would point out, Gel, that you have not included variations on "I opposed invading but now that we are there..." and "We are at war for better or worse. Changing leaders is a bad idea." I am also not convinced that there is a mandate for war in the first place. Dana ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:136750 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
